Page 28 of 130

Re: Stupid questions about motorised conveyances

Posted: Sat May 28, 2022 9:44 am
by mercrocker
Basic Minis did indeed persist with the bent wand until the Minispares catalogue indicates, de Luxe (ie 3 clock ones) would have remotes by then. Can't recall any reference to them in the Clubman, even the earliest cars in brochures seem to show remotes so possibly as mentioned earlier a bad retrofit. Why put an 848 in a Clubbie though? I assume the hole would still have been there with a screwed-over blanking plate but even so seems an odd swap unless somebody was brassic.....

Re: Stupid questions about motorised conveyances

Posted: Sun May 29, 2022 5:39 pm
by AMCrebel
Warren t claim wrote: Sat May 28, 2022 3:02 am not the Mk1 straight lever but the later one that was bent upwards.
Now you've done it. In my memory all straight levers were remote (there were different types including some aftermarket ones).
As far as I recall, all "magic wand" levers had that little kick at the end so the last couple of inches was more upright. So now I am wondering what the Mk1 Straight lever you talk of is?

Re: Stupid questions about motorised conveyances

Posted: Sun May 29, 2022 5:57 pm
by mercrocker
Very early Minis had a straight (i.e. unkinked) magic wand - up until around March 1960ish when a bend was introduced into it to make it slightly more comfortable to use....
gettyimages-90025205-1024x1024.jpg
gettyimages-90025205-1024x1024.jpg (100.43 KiB) Viewed 695 times

Re: Stupid questions about motorised conveyances

Posted: Mon May 30, 2022 9:31 am
by AMCrebel
Thanks both - I have learned something (again).

Re: Stupid questions about motorised conveyances

Posted: Tue May 31, 2022 6:39 pm
by AMCrebel
Would I be a total thundercunt to put this in the boot of my AMC?
s-l1600 (59).jpg
s-l1600 (59).jpg (42.79 KiB) Viewed 651 times
https://www.ebay.co.uk/itm/265648506685

As I mentioned on the thread about it, the Fuel Injection needs a return line, and despite some good ideas about putting it in the fuel filler, or even modifying the gauge sender/pickup unit I can't help feeling a replacement tank might be better - even if I did have to pop the boot to fill the fucker.

Re: Stupid questions about motorised conveyances

Posted: Tue May 31, 2022 6:55 pm
by LynehamHerc
In my opinion no, it looks like a pragmatic solution.

Re: Stupid questions about motorised conveyances

Posted: Tue May 31, 2022 7:44 pm
by Eddie Honda
Paging Drum or other LR botherers...

What it like overhauling the brakes (that are stuck on) on a Defender (1990)? Is anything horrendously expensive?

Re: Stupid questions about motorised conveyances

Posted: Tue May 31, 2022 7:52 pm
by Hooli
I don't think Defenders came out till a year or two after that, it'll be a Ninety or One-Ten.

Might make a difference if the axles got updated for the Tdi. I don't recall anything expensive when I had a Disco with much the same running gear though.

Re: Stupid questions about motorised conveyances

Posted: Tue May 31, 2022 7:59 pm
by mercrocker
AMCrebel wrote: Tue May 31, 2022 6:39 pm Would I be a total thundercunt to put this in the boot of my AMC?


Why should you worry about that? It looks like a workable solution with the huge added benefit of being clean and untainted. Secure, too. I wouldn't think twice about such a solution in any of my cars.

Re: Stupid questions about motorised conveyances

Posted: Tue May 31, 2022 8:12 pm
by Hooli
mercrocker wrote: Tue May 31, 2022 7:59 pm
AMCrebel wrote: Tue May 31, 2022 6:39 pm Would I be a total thundercunt to put this in the boot of my AMC?


Why should you worry about that? It looks like a workable solution with the huge added benefit of being clean and untainted. Secure, too. I wouldn't think twice about such a solution in any of my cars.
Is there a proper firewall between the boot & interior?