Stupid questions about motorised conveyances
- Hooli
- Self Appointed Internet God
- Posts: 33551
- Joined: Mon Apr 08, 2019 9:25 pm
- Has thanked: 14349 times
- Been thanked: 11128 times
Re: Stupid questions about motorised conveyances
Still should be road legal though?
Private signature, do not read
-
- Posts: 13757
- Joined: Sun Apr 14, 2019 11:24 pm
- Has thanked: 1827 times
- Been thanked: 2713 times
Re: Stupid questions about motorised conveyances
Oh my windscreen cracked officer whilst I was abroad with the circus and I'm returning home to the UK to get it changed on the insurance...
Best tip is only to move after dark or in convoy.
- Warren t claim
- Posts: 15772
- Joined: Thu Apr 11, 2019 10:16 pm
- Location: Wirral
- Has thanked: 6722 times
- Been thanked: 9454 times
Re: Stupid questions about motorised conveyances
FFS! What have I done now?Eddie Honda wrote: ↑Thu Oct 20, 2022 12:44 am That Warren T 'Stalin' Claim has been at it again...Never had that on AS. Power mad cunt.
TDW disclock and killswitch champion.
- Eddie Honda
- Rainman The Google Fu Master
- Posts: 21561
- Joined: Tue Apr 09, 2019 10:45 pm
- Location: 寄居町
- Has thanked: 13453 times
- Been thanked: 13267 times
Re: Stupid questions about motorised conveyances
It could of been the workshy glass-back macaque shagger. It was way past Mario's bedtime and Fried Onions does fuck all, but you've got form.Warren t claim wrote: ↑Thu Oct 20, 2022 11:48 pmFFS! What have I done now?Eddie Honda wrote: ↑Thu Oct 20, 2022 12:44 am That Warren T 'Stalin' Claim has been at it again...Never had that on AS. Power mad cunt.
- Hooli
- Self Appointed Internet God
- Posts: 33551
- Joined: Mon Apr 08, 2019 9:25 pm
- Has thanked: 14349 times
- Been thanked: 11128 times
Re: Stupid questions about motorised conveyances
What's he done Rainman?
Private signature, do not read
- Warren t claim
- Posts: 15772
- Joined: Thu Apr 11, 2019 10:16 pm
- Location: Wirral
- Has thanked: 6722 times
- Been thanked: 9454 times
Re: Stupid questions about motorised conveyances
I think Eddie needs his own unique rank on here.
TDW disclock and killswitch champion.
- Eddie Honda
- Rainman The Google Fu Master
- Posts: 21561
- Joined: Tue Apr 09, 2019 10:45 pm
- Location: 寄居町
- Has thanked: 13453 times
- Been thanked: 13267 times
- paulplom
- The Geordie Lord, Mario!
- Posts: 26176
- Joined: Fri Aug 23, 2019 7:01 am
- Has thanked: 10323 times
- Been thanked: 5511 times
Re: Stupid questions about motorised conveyances
Not bedtime per se. It gets to 6 or 7pm and I mute my phone and stick it down the side on the sofa so I don't have to deal with the general public anymore.
- 8BAK465
- Posts: 839
- Joined: Tue Apr 09, 2019 10:54 pm
- Location: Wobshire
- Has thanked: 189 times
- Been thanked: 575 times
Re: Stupid questions about motorised conveyances
So I would like to put an alternator on the Cortina which originally came with a Dynamo I have read all the stuff about linking the regulator wires to bypass them etc but it seems after that its just fit and go?
The one thing I cant help but wonder though is will it fry the original wiring?
The output from the Dynamo seems to go along the passengers wing into the separate regulator then leaves the engine bay through the bulkhead connector on that side goes though the cabin and exits on the drivers side and goes to the battery and of course all the circuits feed off this main artery.
Now call me thick but the Dynamo is 25 amp output and the alternator twice that so as it doesn't charge the battery direct but passes through the car is that main cable up to the job of 50amps the alternator can supply?
Everybody just seems to bypass the regulator and fit the alternator but keeps the existing loom and I have my concerns as the wire carried much less dynamo current when the car had a Dynamo.
Thoughts
The one thing I cant help but wonder though is will it fry the original wiring?
The output from the Dynamo seems to go along the passengers wing into the separate regulator then leaves the engine bay through the bulkhead connector on that side goes though the cabin and exits on the drivers side and goes to the battery and of course all the circuits feed off this main artery.
Now call me thick but the Dynamo is 25 amp output and the alternator twice that so as it doesn't charge the battery direct but passes through the car is that main cable up to the job of 50amps the alternator can supply?
Everybody just seems to bypass the regulator and fit the alternator but keeps the existing loom and I have my concerns as the wire carried much less dynamo current when the car had a Dynamo.
Thoughts
[For God so loved the world that he gave his one and only Son, that whoever believes in him shall not perish but have eternal life.
- Asimo
- Posts: 639
- Joined: Thu May 23, 2019 7:46 pm
- Location: In the wind
- Has thanked: 809 times
- Been thanked: 1155 times
Re: Stupid questions about motorised conveyances
If you connect the alternator output directly to the battery side of the starter solenoid with cable of 10 square mm+ cross section area then the original wiring is not going to see any higher loads because of the alternator upgrade. The other changes to delete the dynamo & regulator will still all need to be done.