Cars that I thought would not be shit but were

Talk about your cars etc here. Keep it sort of sensible and on topic please.
Post Reply
User avatar
Warren t claim
Posts: 15729
Joined: Thu Apr 11, 2019 10:16 pm
Location: Wirral
Has thanked: 6690 times
Been thanked: 9418 times

Re: Cars that I thought would not be shit but were

Post by Warren t claim »

John F wrote: Fri Jun 14, 2019 1:22 am Maserati Biturbos are evil bastards that will spin on the fucking spot without warning. Short chassis & loads of power, plus a bit (although not all that much tbf) of turbo lag.
I seized a Biturbo on behalf of the VAT many years ago and being a sly cunt I scheduled it's uplifting for a Friday night so I could hang on to it for the weekend. To its credit it didn't break down and the only fault with the thing was a very lazy passenger side electric window motor.
TDW disclock and killswitch champion.
Sloth
Posts: 27
Joined: Tue Jun 11, 2019 1:28 am
Has thanked: 1 time
Been thanked: 7 times

Re: Cars that I thought would not be shit but were

Post by Sloth »

HOLDEN VF GTS LSA. TOO MUCH POWER IN A FUCKING TAXI. CAN BE OUTCORNERED BY A DACIA SAQNDERO
User avatar
John F
Posts: 2584
Joined: Wed Apr 10, 2019 1:52 pm
Location: Yr Hen Ogledd
Has thanked: 447 times
Been thanked: 553 times

Re: Cars that I thought would not be shit but were

Post by John F »

I drove mine for a full year before it stuffed its engine (now repaired), and it's a nervous, skittish thing at the best of times. Yep it's powerful, but it'll bite you hard on the arse if you take your eye off the ball for a moment. It's a bitch.

It's ACE.
On the road:
1998 Disco 4.0 V8 (manual)
1994 Vauxhall Calibra 3.0 V6

Running but need fettling:

1986 Honda CBX750F
1991 Maserati 222 SE
1990 Yamaha XJ900F

Tax & MOT-exempt, woohoo!

1982 Suzuki GSX1100SZ Katana
User avatar
LynehamHerc
Boomer, gammon, senile old fart and Eurosmasher!
Posts: 20670
Joined: Wed Apr 10, 2019 1:37 am
Location: Here
Has thanked: 13806 times
Been thanked: 3624 times

Re: Cars that I thought would not be shit but were

Post by LynehamHerc »

It sounds like the sort of car I'd keep for sunny mornings when I felt like a drive and in the garage at all others.
The Reverend Bluejeans
Prize Cunt
Posts: 6314
Joined: Wed Apr 10, 2019 6:31 pm
Location: Big Al Granvia’s armpit.
Has thanked: 718 times
Been thanked: 2334 times

Re: Cars that I thought would not be shit but were

Post by The Reverend Bluejeans »

A mate of mine has a Ghibli that did just that. He's not driven it for 10-15 years.
User avatar
cros
The Elastrator
Posts: 5812
Joined: Sat Apr 13, 2019 9:58 am
Has thanked: 1902 times
Been thanked: 2120 times

Re: Cars that I thought would not be shit but were

Post by cros »

John F wrote: Tue Jun 11, 2019 12:26 pm I drove a new Bentley Continental GT V8 back in 2014.

Priced at £125,000 or thereabouts, it was discernibly worse in almost all respects than my 1994 Vauxhall Calibra V6.

There was such a lot wrong with it IMO that I'm not going to list it all here, but the one thing I really disliked about it is that the steering did not become firmer at higher speeds. If I'd sneezed during a brief 3-figure blat down a local motorway I suspect I'd have ended up in the Armco.
I can quite believe this. The ability to register real qualities seems to have deserted car buyers. I drove an M sport BMW briefly yesterday- it was nicely made and had many attributes but seemed to fall down in the one area that I would expect to be a given on such a car- the engine felt and even sounded like a fucking diesel. I'm guessing it might be a direct injection, but whatever boxes it ticks on paper it didn't give me the slightest horn.
User avatar
AutoshiteBoy
Posts: 3002
Joined: Mon Apr 22, 2019 12:51 pm
Has thanked: 1157 times
Been thanked: 720 times

Re: Cars that I thought would not be shit but were

Post by AutoshiteBoy »

Am I the only sane person here who expects a car to go where I point it, without fail?
NorfolkNWeigh
Posts: 1765
Joined: Wed May 01, 2019 1:00 pm
Has thanked: 1273 times
Been thanked: 3391 times

Re: Cars that I thought would not be shit but were

Post by NorfolkNWeigh »

John F wrote: Fri Jun 14, 2019 1:22 am Maserati Biturbos are evil bastards that will spin on the fucking spot without warning. Short chassis & loads of power, plus a bit (although not all that much tbf) of turbo lag.
I drove a couple when they were new, 430 autos. They were generally as shit as I expected them to be, flaky electrics, leaky sunroofs, unreliable, unstable etc etc. But they did go well in a straight line.
The first one got written off when the director's wife lost it on a roundabout on the school run. He of course ordered another one, that came from the receivers of the importer at the time . It was even worse , I remember him walking into the transport office one morning carrying one of the plastic over sills , that had fallen off that morning- it was attached with 3 long screws into already rusty holes in the sill ( about 3 months old at the time)
I once tried to find out how fast it would go, but it was so scary at about 130, I bottled out. Another time on the way to the office , I came across a Thema Turbo with Italian badges etc, I gave it a bit out of roundabout, showing off, just about managed not to stack it. The lads in the Thema loved it, so much so they followed me to the office and wanted to chat , laughing and shouting about how sideways it was. Trouble was the guy who's car it was was standing in reception!
I just told him they were crazy Italians, and I didn't know what they were saying.
User avatar
Junkman
Posts: 2948
Joined: Wed Apr 10, 2019 11:52 am
Location: The Parallel Universe of R16 Ownership
Has thanked: 258 times
Been thanked: 1253 times

Re: Cars that I thought would not be shit but were

Post by Junkman »

AutoshiteBoy wrote: Fri Jun 14, 2019 7:56 pm Am I the only sane person here who expects a car to go where I point it, without fail?
Yes.

Cars don't do that.
Supply Chain Disruption

1957 DKW 3=6 Sonderklasse
1967 Renault 16 GL
1983 Renault 4 TL
2001 Mercedes E240
2002 Datsun Dice
User avatar
Jazoli
Posts: 608
Joined: Wed Apr 10, 2019 9:34 pm
Has thanked: 137 times
Been thanked: 338 times

Re: Cars that I thought would not be shit but were

Post by Jazoli »

AutoshiteBoy wrote: Fri Jun 14, 2019 7:56 pm Am I the only sane person here who expects a car to go where I point it, without fail?
You can't defy the laws of physics, although here's one for you to think about, if I want to turn left on my motorcycle I actually turn the bars to the right :mrgreen:
CBA
Post Reply