Cars that I thought would be shit but weren't.

Talk about your cars etc here. Keep it sort of sensible and on topic please.
SiC
It's S small i C
Posts: 9356
Joined: Sun Apr 28, 2019 8:59 am
Has thanked: 1821 times
Been thanked: 5361 times

Re: Cars that I thought would be shit but weren't.

Post by SiC »

bub2006 wrote: Tue Jun 11, 2019 4:42 pm 05 plated astra would be the cdti engine with 16v and around 100bhp minimum. Joint venture with another manufacturer maybe? The GM and Isuzu was a different engine altogether.
I thought the 1.7 ctdi astra h was still a Isuzu block?

I know the 1.7 16v Isuzu lump with common rail injection was on the 1998-2005 Civic. Iirc came in around 2002 and shoe horned in for the company car market. I had it in a 3 door and was a proper rare car even then. Made parts a nightmare (a month to have a coolant pipe custom made by Honda, £300 for an Aircon condenser - only from Honda) and working in the engine bay really bad as not designed at the outset for it.
User avatar
Guest
Posts: 2754
Joined: Sat Jun 01, 2019 8:22 pm
Has thanked: 881 times
Been thanked: 1328 times

Re: Cars that I thought would be shit but weren't.

Post by Guest »

The Trabant, according to some informed sources the worst car in the world. I was pleasantly surprised, it was crude, but quite well made crude. It had quirks, but, was useable transport as a runaround.
bub2006
Tenth Dan Tetris Gnu
Posts: 6229
Joined: Wed Apr 10, 2019 6:41 pm
Has thanked: 387 times
Been thanked: 2279 times

Re: Cars that I thought would be shit but weren't.

Post by bub2006 »

SiC wrote: Tue Jun 11, 2019 4:59 pm
bub2006 wrote: Tue Jun 11, 2019 4:42 pm 05 plated astra would be the cdti engine with 16v and around 100bhp minimum. Joint venture with another manufacturer maybe? The GM and Isuzu was a different engine altogether.
I thought the 1.7 ctdi astra h was still a Isuzu block?

I know the 1.7 16v Isuzu lump with common rail injection was on the 1998-2005 Civic. Iirc came in around 2002 and shoe horned in for the company car market. I had it in a 3 door and was a proper rare car even then. Made parts a nightmare (a month to have a coolant pipe custom made by Honda, £300 for an Aircon condenser - only from Honda) and working in the engine bay really bad as not designed at the outset for it.
GM engine I believe but from what I know it's totally different to the 60-80bhp lump made by gm in the 90s. I think the early 1.7 was a modification of the 1.6 Opel/Vauxhall/GM lump of the 80s
bub2006
Tenth Dan Tetris Gnu
Posts: 6229
Joined: Wed Apr 10, 2019 6:41 pm
Has thanked: 387 times
Been thanked: 2279 times

Re: Cars that I thought would be shit but weren't.

Post by bub2006 »

Sri05 wrote: Tue Jun 11, 2019 4:49 pm
bub2006 wrote: Tue Jun 11, 2019 4:42 pm 05 plated astra would be the cdti engine with 16v and around 100bhp minimum. Joint venture with another manufacturer maybe? The GM and Isuzu was a different engine altogether.
This was a very late Astra G, I'm certain it was the Isuzu engine, could be wrong though!
The dti was an evolution of the old donkey but I think the cdti was another manufacturer having input. I don't think it was a fiat lump like the 1.9 though.
SiC
It's S small i C
Posts: 9356
Joined: Sun Apr 28, 2019 8:59 am
Has thanked: 1821 times
Been thanked: 5361 times

Re: Cars that I thought would be shit but weren't.

Post by SiC »

Guest wrote: Tue Jun 11, 2019 6:17 pm The Trabant, according to some informed sources the worst car in the world. I was pleasantly surprised, it was crude, but quite well made crude. It had quirks, but, was useable transport as a runaround.
That's a car which has been on my bucket list for a very long time.
User avatar
AutoshiteBoy
Posts: 3002
Joined: Mon Apr 22, 2019 12:51 pm
Has thanked: 1157 times
Been thanked: 720 times

Re: Cars that I thought would be shit but weren't.

Post by AutoshiteBoy »

Volvo 400-series range. I though they all were great and miles better than a 300-series

Vauxhall Corsa auto. The addition of PAS and a proper gearbox made a huge difference.

MGB and Maestros both get the thumbs up from me.

Rover 825. Thats the VM engined 800, not the Honda or Rover V6. These things felt and smelt like a HST 125 on the motorway.
User avatar
Junkman
Posts: 2948
Joined: Wed Apr 10, 2019 11:52 am
Location: The Parallel Universe of R16 Ownership
Has thanked: 258 times
Been thanked: 1253 times

Re: Cars that I thought would be shit but weren't.

Post by Junkman »

SiC wrote: Tue Jun 11, 2019 2:30 pm they're a pile of shit. Well compared to modern cars they are of course
U WOT M8 ???
Supply Chain Disruption

1957 DKW 3=6 Sonderklasse
1967 Renault 16 GL
1983 Renault 4 TL
2001 Mercedes E240
2002 Datsun Dice
User avatar
Hooli
Self Appointed Internet God
Posts: 33436
Joined: Mon Apr 08, 2019 9:25 pm
Has thanked: 14287 times
Been thanked: 11091 times

Re: Cars that I thought would be shit but weren't.

Post by Hooli »

Volvo 400s are as shit as 300s, in fact they are worse as they aren't even comfy to sit in while they utterly fail to be a car.
Private signature, do not read
User avatar
Kringle
Posts: 25
Joined: Sat Jun 08, 2019 1:43 am
Has thanked: 22 times
Been thanked: 24 times

Re: Cars that I thought would be shit but weren't.

Post by Kringle »

Had a Clio 1.2tce hire car which turned out to be great, once you deactivated any eco bollocks.

And yes Panda 100hp is a barrel of laughs.
User avatar
NergleFuttocks
Globalist Imperialist Pig Dog!
Posts: 3702
Joined: Wed Apr 10, 2019 5:41 pm
Location: Wymondham
Has thanked: 220 times
Been thanked: 636 times

Re: Cars that I thought would be shit but weren't.

Post by NergleFuttocks »

1991 Nissan Pulsar (blobby Sunny shape) 1.6 SLX

Loved that thing and due to the efi engine, had just enough power to hoon about but not enough to damage you.

Made my Newcastle to Norwich journeys at the beginning and end of the week a pleasure. One of my metrics for a car is how is it on the A17?

Probably the car I would most like to own again. H774HEW. Probably long dead now.

Pug 405 and Scorpio 2.9 follow this but don’t apply to this criteria as literally everybody in the known world agrees that they are great.
Post Reply